Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Washington Square as American Melodrama


Summary:

Henry James begins his novel by describing the life of Dr. Austin Sloper, whose wife and first and only son die tragically in the span on 5 years. The story then follows the life of Dr. Sloper’s daughter, Catherine. 

While Catherine is described as being loyal and faithful, her father is still disappointed in her. He resents Catherine because she doesn’t carry any of her parent’s traits, like her mother’s beauty and her father’s intelligence. Overall, she is viewed as a boring, plain girl, and Dr. Sloper struggles to love her despite his disappointment.

The other prominent characters in the work are Dr. Sloper’s sisters, Mrs. Almond and Lavinia Penniman. Lavinia and Mrs. Almond serve as maternal figures to Catherine. Lavinia wants the best for Catherine, but she is often preoccupied with melodramatic tendencies and delusional ideas of love. Mrs. Almond, on the other hand, is more calculated and realistic but still understanding and supportive of Catherine.

Early on in the novel, Catherine meets Morris Townsend at her cousin Marian’s engagement party. They are immediately interested and drawn to each other. Aunt Lavinia has also taken an interest in Catherine and Mr. Townsend’s potential relationship, and serves as a mediator between the two, trying fiercely to foster their romantic relationship.

Themes:

Familial relationships

Familial relationships are of paramount importance in Washington Square, especially the relationship between Catherine and her father. I found it interesting that, while we understand that Dr. Sloper does not particularly love Catherine, he develops strong feelings regarding her relationship with Mr. Townsend.

"Young men of his class never do anything for themselves that they can get other people to do for them, and it is the infatuation, the devotion, the superstition of others that keeps them going.” (page 70)

The above quote demonstrates Dr. Sloper’s dislike of Mr. Townsend. He is quick to place Morris in a box based on his profession, despite not knowing him very well. Dr. Sloper believes Mr. Townsend is manipulative and selfish, and that Catherine’s “infatuation” and “devotion” towards him will blind her to the truth of his evil character.

·        However, to a certain extent, I think Dr. Sloper is quite emotionally manipulative towards Catherine. He becomes angry when Catherine chooses not to listen to him, even though he hasn’t expressed interest or care throughout the entirety of her childhood. This shocks Catherine, but it doesn’t deter her from pursuing Morris. In fact, I think her father’s disapproval only heightens her defiance. Moreover, Dr. Sloper threatens to disown her if she marries Mr. Townsend. I think Dr. Sloper believes his behavior towards Catherine is justified because of their father/daughter relationship, but he is just as manipulative as the suitor he so despises. There are expectations associated with Catherine and Dr. Sloper’s relationship, namely that because Catherine was born into a family of high social class, she is expected to be modest, respectful, and obedient to her father; it is precisely in her disregard of these expectations that melodrama arises.

Fantasy vs. Reality

There are several characters whose ideologies exist in either reality or the fantasy realm. For example, Mrs. Almond serves as the foil to Aunt Lavinia; she is the rational to Lavinia’s imaginative, the grounding realism to Lavinia’s romantic fantasies. The juxtaposition of these two characters as well as their impact on Catherine heightens the overall melodrama of the novel.

In “The Melodramatic Imagination,” Peter Brooks says, “The desire to express all seems a fundamental characteristic of the melodramatic mode. Nothing is spared because nothing is left unsaid; the characters stand on stage and utter the unspeakable, give voice to their deepest feelings, dramatize through their heightened and polarized words and gestures the whole lesson of their relationship.” Lavinia embodies this “desire to express all,” she is never shy about her opinions and, consequently, is one of the driving plot devices.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Washington Square by Henry James (focus on the second half of the work)

Synopsis:









Washington Square is a short novel written by Henry James, published in 1880 and set in the 1850s. The story is both tragic and comical to a certain extent. The heroine Catherine, the daughter of an intelligent doctor, falls in love with Morris Townsend who is charming but poor and deceptive in his nature. Her father Dr. Sloper strongly opposed their relationship because he shrewdly sensed that Townsend only pursues Catherine for her money, that he is “mercenary”. The heroine is in deep conflict, having to choose between her father and her newly meet lover. According to the ominous third person narrative, Catherine is overly obedient, docile, veracious and unclever in her father’s point of view, which makes her rebellion “quiet” but meaningful, struggling to maintain her role as a good daughter. As the plot precedes, Catherine defended her standing but Morris jilted her after her father’s incessant disapproval and threat to disinherit Catherine. Cather and Morris break up. Decades past, when they meet again, Catherine becomes clear-minded about their relationship and refused Morris’ proposal of acquainting with each other again. Catherine’s aunt Lavinia plays of major role in the form and break of the relationship. Lavinia’s meddlesomeness is one of the most comical elements of this novel.              




Analysis of the novel:

Analysis of relationships

The father-daughter relationship of Catherine and Dr. Austin has its plurality. Because of the character of Catherine’s mother, who was clever and bright, Austin prospected Catherine to be at least as bright and as special. However, due to the nurture of Mrs. Penniman or the nature of Catherine, Catherine seems rather dull and unintelligent for her father. As a result, Dr. Sloper dislikes her as a person. Catherine herself realized that after their trip to Europe. She is clear that her father doesn’t like her because of her personality and it caused her great agony. He was harsh to her, wishing Catherine to grow up to be someone else. At the end when Morris left her, Dr. Sloper sarcastically remarked, “You mean you don’t care? You are rather cruel, after encouraging him and playing with him for so long!” It is unlikely a normal loving father would say so to a daughter after she was tricked by another man.        

"I have told you what I think. If you see him, you will be an ungrateful, cruel child; you will have given your old father the greatest pain of his life." This was more than the poor girl could bear; her tears overflowed


Catherine’s relationship with Morris is tragic. She thought he loves her. Most comically, the narrator (James) points out that Morris is conscious about the fact that he only wants to marry her for her money and that she is rather dull and stupid. The relationship is not spontaneous but prompted by Mrs. Penniman’s imagination and meddlesomeness. This consciousness of the readers, knowing that Morris deliberately fools Catherine, Dr. Sloper is right, and Mrs. Penniman only cares about her imagination (a desire for romantic drama), renders the novel extremely melodramatic.   

The role of Lavinia Penniman 

Aunt Lavinia is important for the transition and development of the plot. She is the one who urged Catherine to notice Morris Townsend, and the one who suggests that tactics for the couple to take to convince her brother. However, she acts as a comical role and is inconsiderate and stupid. In the last chapter, it is clear that the mindset of Catherine has changed; she has grown mature psychologically. However, Lavinia is still the old Lavinia who is eager for melodrama and excitement of theatricality in life.

"Yes—why indeed?" sighed Mrs. Penniman. And then, as if from a sense of the inadequacy of this explanation, "But you will not despair—you will come back?"

















Catherine Sloper

-Inward conflict: to be a good daughter or to marry Morris Townsend 
-Development of her character: love for Morris --- fights for her marriage --- abandoned my Morris --- refuse to marry --- determined about the nature of her father and Morris; 
-Consciousness of characters: at the end, she was crystal clear about her situation. She had a quiet life but also tragic, with limited love from parents and the deceptive Morris Townsend. It is possible that James feels sorry for her.   

-From her own point of view the great facts of her career were that Morris Townsend had trifled with her affection, and that her father had broken its spring. Nothing could ever alter these facts; they were always there, like her name, her age, her plain face. Nothing could ever undo the wrong or cure the painthat Morris had inflicted on her, and nothing could ever make her feel towards her father as she felt in her younger years.


Good and Evil in Washington Square 



In melodrama, good and evil is usually clear and in contrast. However, from my point of view, James complexes the boundary to a certain extent. Although Morris Townsend is detested and Dr. Sloper is harsh, James seemingly challenged the attributions of the tragedy. Who should be blamed in the story? Arguing from a contemporary view, it is hard to say Morris Townsend should be solely blames. It is true that he is morally irresponsible and wrong, but Catherine (her innocence), Dr. Sloper (his harshness), and aunt Lavinia (her stupidity) all play into the result of the break. For historical reasons, the unequal dynamic of their relationship might not be accepted in the 1880s, but maybe right now, they could be together even if Morris is monetarily disadvantaged. As long as they are happy, maybe it is acceptable that she supports him. Is Catherine the absolute good? It is doubtful because she is quiet, traditionally, and filial, which doesn’t necessarily carry moral connotations. James might be criticizing her simplicity that contributes to the tragedy. But, according to Catherine’s own reflection of her relationship with Morris and her father, after Morris left her, she has developed a lucid understanding of the nature of her relations; she knows she’s deeply hurt by these two men, and it is clear for her the true nature of Morris that her father was right. James, all in all, created a morally corrupted character, Morris Townsend with his hypocrisy. 

Washington Square as a Melodrama 

The short novel is quite melodramatic because of story settings, construction of characters, themes, theatricality, and intensification of conflicts through dialogues. 

According to Brook’s article, Henry James uses theatric setting to tell the story. At the scene that Austin and Catherine talked at the Alps in Europe, James strategically set the conversation at an environment that matches Catherine’s emotion and mindset. Her father questioned her if she has given up. Her answer is unsatisfactory for Dr. Sloper. Instead of a common hotel room or museum, James deliberately chooses the Alps, which is dramatic and visual for readers.

Henry James is descriptive about the settings of events. For example, in the last chapter, the weather is hotter than balmy. Things are dramatic and lightly exaggerated, which resembles a drama in the theatre.  

They followed this devious way, and finally lost the path; the valley proved very wild and rough, and their walk became rather a scramble.








Golden Demon (movie)

Golden Demon 

   The Golden Demon is a 1954 movie directed by Koji Shima. The original novel was written by Ozaki Koyo.
Image from when Kanichi confronts Miya

Summary:

This movie opens with a scene showing a social gathering, and some of the main characters are introduced. Kanichi and Miya are in love and want to be together, while Tomiyama is a man who is interested in making Miya his wife. However, Miya only wants to be with Kanichi, and as the days pass, she and Kanichi are visibly close to each other, while Miya’s parents do not entirely approve. They tell Miya that she would be better off marrying a wealthy person like Tomiyama, and that doing so would help Kanichi financially as well. Although Miya is not happy with the idea, her parents claim that giving up Kanichi for Tomiyama would ultimately bring everyone happiness, and Miya feels pressured by that thought.
Later, Miya is obliged to go see Tomiyama after receiving a gift from him. Kanichi gets word of this and, with the help of some of his friends, is able to pay for transportation to immediately go see Miya. They speak to each other on the beach that night, and Kanichi brings up her potential marriage to Tomiyama. When Miya doesn’t fully deny it and considers hypothetically the outcomes of a marriage to Tomiyama, Kanichi is shocked and feels betrayed. He starts arguing with her, and then becomes very distraught as he sees that Miya is wearing Tomiyama’s ring, and even kicks her away as she tries to cling to him. He says to forever remember the sadness he felt on this night, and then Miya, overcome by sadness, is left alone on the beach.
Four years later, Kanichi and Miya have completely drifted apart. Kanichi has begun working with Akagashi, a woman known for being a cruel loan shark. Kanichi’s personality has radically changed, as he is willing to speak harshly and unkindly to the debtors, even as their lives are ruined from their involvement with Akagashi.
Meanwhile, Tomiyama is now Miya’s husband, but any affection he may have once shown to her is gone. Instead, he treats her as lower than everybody else, and he verbally abuses her at every opportunity. Because of this, Miya has been living in misery, but she feels that she inflicted a similar kind of pain upon Kanichi when she married Tomiyama. Miya’s mother understands Miya’s suffering, and she fully regrets her decision to convince Miya to marry Tomiyama, as she believes that Kanichi would have given Miya a better life than Tomiyama.
Kanichi, however, wants nothing to do with Miya, as he still feels anger about what happened in the past. He continues working with Akagashi, but gets into a fight with debtors when they remind him of their past friendship with him. He is harsh toward them, but afterward, he decides to help, and asks Akagashi if he can settle his friend’s debt. Akagashi is reluctant to do so, as she seems to enjoy the process of torturing her clients. As Kanichi tries to convince her, she attempts to seduce him, taking advantage of his desire to pay for the debt. He hesitantly goes along with her for a little while, but eventually declares that he cannot be with her because he no longer wants romance after his experience with Miya. He ensures that the payment is completed in spite of Akagashi’s manipulative tactics.
Miya, who has not seen Kanichi since her marriage to Tomiyama, runs into Kanichi’s friend and desperately tries to convince him to take her to Kanichi. They spend time talking together, and Miya expresses the guilt she feels for not being with Kanichi, and admits that she spends a large amount of time just thinking about him, as she knows that there is no way she would be able to be happy with Tomiyama. Although Kanichi’s friend does listen to what she says, he refuses Miya’s request, explaining that he is no longer close to Kanichi, and Kanichi would not want to see Miya anyway.
Miya returns to her room, and then shortly afterward, Tomiyama returns. He notes that Miya has been recovering from a sickness, and berates her for being ill. Miya apologizes, but Tomiyama continues speaking unkindly. He sees Miya’s diary and takes it from her despite her protests. He goes through the pages, pointing out how much time Miya spent thinking about Kanichi, and he is dissatisfied with this. He continues to speak sharply to Miya, alleging that Miya is the one who ruined their relationship because of her emotionless attitude around him, and he uses this as an excuse to justify his unending cruel behavior. After Tomiyama heads out for the day, Miya realizes that one of the household assistants owes a debt to Kanichi, and she decides to use this information to try to find Kanichi.
Meanwhile, Kanichi is still being unkind to his clients, and he gets into a violent physical fight with one group. Miya stumbles upon this scene and watches from a distance; once the fight breaks up, Kanichi’s friend finally brings her to seem him. Kanichi is infuriated when Miya appears, and although Miya begs Kanichi to understand her, he refuses to listen. Their meeting is interrupted when Akagashi enters, and Miya hastily leaves upon seeing her.
            Eventually, Kanichi and Akagashi are disturbed when they hear a noise outside. Kanichi goes to investigate and finds out that one of their clients, whose son had been imprisoned as a result of Akagashi’s debt traps, has come with a weapon to try to force them to return her son. Kanichi tries to stop her, and accidentally hurts her in the process, which comes as a shock to him. He goes inside, but shortly afterward they find that the house has been set on fire.
The fire catches the attention of the whole neighborhood, including Tomiyama’s household. Although there is panic on the streets, Tomiyama is only amused, and wants to watch the disaster unfold. Miya wants to go help, but he refuses to let her.
Kanichi desperately tries to salvage the papers and money that are burning in the fire, even as others get to safety. In the end, when the fire has finally been fully extinguished, he remains in the ruins of the house. Miya, who has managed to get away from Tomiyama, comes to him and once again tries to convince him that she does not want to be with Tomiyama. He rejects her once again, and she leaves, very upset.
In her misery, Miya walks into a river and begins to float through the water. Kanichi notices one of her belongings floating down the stream, and he begins to panic as he realizes that Miya’s life is in danger. He rushes to find her, and then pulls her out of the water, desperately hoping that she is okay. Finally, she manages to open her eyes, and the two of them watch the sunrise, finally close to each other again.

Analysis of Melodrama:

One interesting element present in the story is the motif of nature, which is emphasized by certain directorial choices throughout the film. The role of nature in the film appears to emphasize the concepts of freedom and choice, particularly in regard to Miya and Kanichi. 
The theme of nature becomes relevant shortly after Miya and Kanichi leave the party at the beginning of the story. As they walk, Miya comments on the glistening snow, comparing it to diamonds. Kanichi is uncomfortable with her choice of words, as he believes she might be wishing for Tomiyama and his diamond ring; however, Miya firmly denies his suspicions. Kanichi treats this situation much more seriously than one normally would, creating a feeling of melodrama as he fixates on Miya’s offhand comment. However, this melodramatic interaction is representative of Miya’s plight in the overall story. Miya was appreciating the snow in its natural state, whereas Tomiyama’s ring consists of natural materials that have been artificially crafted into jewelry. This is comparable to the two possible lives that Miya could have: she could be free to make her own choices and live with Kanichi, but she is pressured by others into marrying Tomiyama to conform to her societal role.
The motif of nature resurfaces when Kanichi and Miya fight on the beach. The setting and dialogue of this scene create an intense feeling of melodrama, which allows the audience to glimpse the emotions harbored by Kanichi and Miya. As Kanichi’s feeling of hurt grows, he notes the dimness of the moonlight, telling Miya to forever associate it with his pain. In this scene, the dimmed moonlight is an indicator of Kanichi and Miya’s disrupted freedom, as the happy future they hoped to have begins to seem impossible. In addition, the location of this scene is a beach’s shore, which is a boundary between the land and ocean. This parallels Miya’s feelings, as she the decision she is facing is an emotional boundary that she does not want to cross.
After Kanichi and Miya have separated, nature continues to be a recurring theme in their individual lives. When Kanichi speaks with the debtors, there is a cat nearby, watching the scene. In this case, the cat, who is naturally not bound by societal expectations, is representative of Kanichi’s true wishes, which have been shut out of his life yet linger at the back of his mind. Kanichi’s is unreasonably harsh to the debtors, creating melodramatic tension as he coldly rejects all of their pleas. This melodrama allows the scene to escalate to the point where a fight breaks out, the cat flees, symbolizing how Kanichi’s worsening personality is driving away his own potential for happiness.
A similar metaphor is present when Akagashi is speaking to one of her clients. As she mocks the debtor, who was once Kanichi’s friend, she keeps a cat on her lap the whole time she is speaking. Once again, this cat is a representation of freedom, but instead of being able to escape like in the previous scene, the cat is held firmly by Akagashi. This shows how Akagashi has not only her own freedom, but also a desire to live by keeping others under control, as she chooses to toy with them for her own amusement. This is a personality trait that would generally not be so obvious in everyday life, but Akagashi’s clearly manipulative personality is an example of the villainous archetype that often fuels conflict in melodramatic stories.
The motif of nature is also embedded in Miya’s life. When Miya finds Kanichi’s friend, they begin talking while Miya feeds birds that are grouped together on the ground. In some ways, these birds are in a situation analogous to Miya’s: although they have the potential to fly freely, they stay on the ground to receive food. Similarly, Miya longed to be free to choose a future with Kanichi, but chose her restricted life because of the potential rewards it once seemed to offer.
In a later scene, when Miya is in her room, it can be seen that one of the decorations is a small tree that happens to be home to several birds. Once again, the birds’ circumstances mirror Miya’s. The birds in the tree have been given the illusion of freedom and happiness, as they have their own tree to inhabit. However, the reality is that these birds are completely cut off from the sky and the rest of nature. Similarly, Miya was forced into her current situation because of how appealing it looked to everyone else, but when the situation was realized, it became clear that life was actually more difficult for everyone, particularly Miya.
The intensity of this symbolism continues to increase within this same scene. When Tomiyama enters the room, he reprimands Miya for having been sick. Tomiyama’s comments here are a clear display of melodrama, as it would be very strange to be scolded for illness in everyday life. However, Tomiyama’s extreme position here serves as an indicator of Miya’s complete severance from nature. Becoming sick is something so natural that it is generally not considered to be a condition one has any control over; yet, in spite of this, Tomiyama expects Miya to be immune to it. In this way, this rejection of nature clearly demonstrates Miya’s lack of freedom: Miya’s actions are not only forced by others, but she is expected to be obedient even in matters she has no control over.
When the story reaches its climax, the nature becomes further intertwined with the plot. After the fire at Kanichi’s house, Miya comes to Kanichi to try to mend their relationship. However, Kanichi continues to reject her, and maintains the same air of hostility that he had shown her previously. In this scene, a dog can be seen standing among the rubble, making no move to leave. This dog represents Kanichi’s refusal to reaccept his freedom, as Kanichi continues to be bound by bitterness even after his new life has been destroyed. Even though he has been given an opportunity to take the life he once wanted, he remains obsessed with the remnants of the life he had built to cope with his despair.
However, in spite of his frustration toward Miya, Kanichi acts immediately when he suspects that Miya is in danger. This change in his emotion is captured by the camera’s shot of an eagle flying overhead, performing a U-turn in the air. This highlights the immediacy with which Kanichi discarded his resentment; although he had built up negative emotions for years, his attitude instantly reversed when he sensed a threat toward Miya. In this way, the reversal in the eagle’s flight represents Kanichi’s renewed desire to achieve the goals he once wished for. This event has elements of melodrama to it, as Kanichi’s complete emotional shift seems almost jarring and unnatural, as he had he had been expressing rage toward Miya until just a few moments ago. The melodrama here indicates that Kanichi’s supposed anger was never completely real, and what may have been truly holding him back was the fear of emotionally opening up to Miya again. Realizing that Miya’s life was in danger created a much stronger feeling of fear, allowing him to overcome all other hesitation.
At the end of the film, as Miya awakens, a flock of birds is shown taking flight into the sky. This symbolism spotlights the attainment of Kanichi and Miya’s original desire, as they are now free from the societal and emotional bounds that had kept them apart. The metaphor is completed by the rising sun, which Miya and Kanichi watch together. This sunrise can be contrasted with the melodrama of the scene in which Miya and Kanichi fought under dim moonlight. At that time, the dimmed moonlight had been representative of the circumstances that had forced misery upon Miya and Kanichi, and the feeling of melodrama was created by the intense feelings of sorrow; on the other hand, the bright sunrise at the finale brings closure to the story, as they can finally pursue the free life that they had wanted from the beginning, creating a sense of melodrama as this sudden happy scene ends the period of suffering the two had experienced.
Overall, the film’s theme of nature seemed to underscore the characters’ changes in freedom throughout the story, as various conflicts and occurrences alter the choices that they have to make. This helps develop the idea that, although people want to have their own freedom, it is in human nature to become entangled and restricted by societal pressure.
Ultimately, the film does bring a proper resolution to the struggles faced by Miya and Kanichi, but there are still open questions that the film does not entirely answer. For example, the film portrays Miya as desperately yearning for Kanichi, but the reason for this is not entirely clear. Although Miya and Kanichi clearly get along at the beginning of the story, Kanichi’s kicks toward her during the beach scene cast some doubt on the reliability of his behavior, and the fact that he never properly listens to what Miya is trying to tell him is also indicative of communication problems in their relationship. Although Tomiyama is clearly far crueler toward Miya than Kanichi is, Kanichi’s overall attitude toward Miya raises the question as to whether they would be able to live peacefully together.
In addition, the film does not answer the question of how Kanichi and Miya will keep living after Kanichi saves her. Although Kanichi’s negative feelings toward Miya have likely disappeared, their relationship still has still gained many layers of complexity because of their conflicts up to this point, and Tomiyama had made it clear earlier that he did not want Miya to be free. In contrast, Miya had told Kanichi that she had left Tomiyama’s household, implying that she is ready to live without Tomiyama. In this way, the film’s ending could be interpreted as either a brief moment of happiness, or as the full revival of the relationship that was present at the beginning of the story.